What is the difference between eclipse versions

On the Welcome screen, click New Project. If you already have a project open, from the main menu select File New Project. In the New Project wizard, select Android on the left. Android Studio is faster than Eclipse. There is no need to add a plugin to Android Studio but if we use Eclipse then we do need to.

Eclipse needs many resources to start but Android Studio does not. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Skip to content Home Thanksgiving Which version of Eclipse is best? Ben Davis February 7, Which version of Eclipse is best?

What are different Eclipse versions? What is the difference between Eclipse and Eclipse neon? Is NetBeans better than Eclipse? Are there any migration issues in the near future from one edition of Eclipse to another? Improve this question. Robert N 1, 1 1 gold badge 14 14 silver badges 31 31 bronze badges.

Diwesh Saxena Diwesh Saxena 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. The concepts are orthogonal.

Improve this answer. Eclipse IDE has more versions like Eclipse 3. SureshS 8 8 silver badges 23 23 bronze badges. As of August , the list of all eclipse versions, 3. Lucky Lucky Late is better than never I suppose — Lightfire Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.

Post as a guest Name. The Eclipse simultaneous release is reliably once a year. How about we use the year it comes out to version it. The added benefit to users is that it becomes immediately obvious how old previous versions are.

As we, as a community, move towards thinking and treating Eclipse more as a product , this is a change that could be well worth the effort. Try killing some brand names, replacing them with descriptors, and channel that power back into your core brand. If a developer is not able to understand the Mars, Neon, etc naming scheme maybe they should stop being developers. According tot his logic, these cool devs would be confused beyond hope if they had to use Ubuntu Linux.

Looks like they decided beforehand that Intellij was cooler anyway, regardless of the current Eclipse naming scheme… Never underestimate the ability of Intellij fans to literally shit on Eclipse invoking whatever minuscule reason cross their mind at the time. But to my colleagues we used the internal versioning scheme 4. I agree with the article. Although I am a long time Eclipse user I never undestood the need of the release train naming.

It was always confusing. Just get rid of it. Developers can understand the difference — no worries. This article was not about that, but about perception in general. Why to bother with confusing names and create mapping: Brand YearOfRelease?

I Just wanted to see today whether I should update my Mars. So, why bother with stupid, uninformative, bogus names that make it impossible to compare releases in a meaningful way without knowing all the gory details of Eclipse IDE evolution over the last decade?

Why should I care? My job is to write code for my customer, not to evaluate Eclipse versions, or track their history. Why make it a research when all you want is to get an IDE installed as quickly as possible and focus on your actual work. And, BTW, while I do use Eclipse as my primary IDE for a variety of reasons, it does suck as a software product — crashes pretty much every other day with normal use.

So, yes, there are IDEs out there that are better. I like this blog post, because you are thinking out the box and you trigger a debate with solid arguments. I like the Release Train code name and I do not think that we need to remove them. I think the branding is getting better over the years custom splash screen, video, release material …. This way our users might better understand that they have a 2 years old release e.

The conference from M. Barbero at Devoxx France was great. But we need more of those conferences. We see a lot of great topics at the EclipseCon, but my feeling is that we are not enough open towards the rest of the java community. This way the circle of convinced Eclipse IDE users can grow. Contributions are welcomed in a lot of subprojects this is something that was improved in the last years. We have a similar confusion within our organisation itself — what should be the third qualifier for the plug-ins?

Is it the project or product name? We typically do not have a product name when the project starts and management wakes up at the end and says that we should have the product name in the source code.

The trouble we had is an inspiration for a movie that will bag the next Oscar ! I think you really missed the point. Not the codenames are the problem but the name eclipse for the IDE. In the beginning eclipse was the name of a very good java IDE and everything was good, but then more and more projects which have nothing to do with a java IDE adopt the brand name eclipse.

So when you search the web for eclipse you get many hits for other projects under the umbrella of the eclipse foundation which have nothing to do with your java IDE. So i think eclipse needs to find a new name for the IDE so that it is much easier for people to find out if an information the find on the internet is related to their favorite IDE or to another eclipse project. What you describe is the literal interpretation of the article, which is also quite interesting.

Especially when there are projects like Eclipse Che which piggyback on the brand created by Eclipse Java IDE, but it is not necessarily obvious to the casual observer that the technologies with the exception of Java indexer are vastly different.

But thinking back of old names it is really not clear what version matches what name.